The 5 Criteria

Each criterion is scored 0-3. Maximum total = 15 points. Recognition threshold: ≥8 total AND ≥3 criteria ≥2.

1

Population Size / Demography

Constitutional Basis: Article 260

What This Criterion Assesses

Numerical minority status, population trends (shrinking/growing), age structure, and demographic vulnerability.

Evidence Sources

  • KNBS census tables
  • Community registers
  • Demographic surveys
  • Administrative records
  • Academic demographic studies

Scoring Rubric

0
Not applicable / no evidence
Community is not a numerical minority
1
Weak / evidence with gaps
Population > 20,000 persons
2
Moderate / consistent evidence
Population 5,000–20,000 persons
3
Strong / corroborated evidence
Population < 5,000 persons
2

Geographic Isolation / Marginalisation

Constitutional Basis: Article 56(e), Article 174(f)

What This Criterion Assesses

Physical remoteness, travel time to basic services, road density, network coverage, infrastructure access.

Evidence Sources

  • Maps showing community location
  • Travel-time analysis to clinics/schools
  • Network coverage data
  • Road density data
  • Government service accessibility reports
  • Photos of terrain/infrastructure

Scoring Rubric

0
Not applicable / no evidence
No geographic isolation
1
Weak / evidence with gaps
Travel time to basic services < 45 minutes
2
Moderate / consistent evidence
Travel time to basic services 45–90 minutes
3
Strong / corroborated evidence
Travel time to basic services > 90 minutes
3

Cultural and Linguistic Distinctiveness

Constitutional Basis: Article 44

What This Criterion Assesses

Language vitality, cultural uniqueness, traditional governance, indigenous identity, risk of cultural erosion.

Evidence Sources

  • UNESCO language vitality assessments
  • Ethnographic reports
  • Cultural inventories
  • Academic papers on linguistic/cultural heritage
  • Documentation of traditional governance structures
  • Community cultural practices documentation

Scoring Rubric

0
Not applicable / no evidence
No cultural/linguistic distinctiveness
1
Weak / evidence with gaps
Limited distinctiveness
2
Moderate / consistent evidence
Partial distinctiveness (some of: distinct language, culture, governance)
3
Strong / corroborated evidence
Distinct language + culture + traditional governance systems
4

Historical Exclusion / Dispossession

Constitutional Basis: Article 27(6), Article 56

What This Criterion Assesses

Documented historical injustices, land dispossession, political exclusion, forced displacement, unimplemented court orders, colonial and post-independence discrimination.

Evidence Sources

  • Archival records
  • Colonial and post-independence government gazettes
  • Court rulings
  • Tribunal decisions
  • Historical petitions
  • Academic historical research
  • Truth, Justice and Reconciliation Commission reports

Scoring Rubric

0
Not applicable / no evidence
No documented exclusion
1
Weak / evidence with gaps
Limited documentation of exclusion
2
Moderate / consistent evidence
Some documented exclusion events
3
Strong / corroborated evidence
Land dispossession AND political exclusion, corroborated across sources
5

Socio-Economic Disadvantage

Constitutional Basis: Article 43

What This Criterion Assesses

Poverty rates, education access, health outcomes, food security, employment rates, housing conditions, access to basic services.

Evidence Sources

  • KNBS data
  • Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey (KIHBS)
  • County government administrative data
  • Health facility records
  • School enrollment data
  • Employment statistics

Scoring Rubric

0
Not applicable / no evidence
No socio-economic disadvantage
1
Weak / evidence with gaps
Some disadvantage in limited areas
2
Moderate / consistent evidence
Several moderate disadvantages across indicators
3
Strong / corroborated evidence
Multiple severe disadvantages — poverty, unemployment, health, education all well above county/national averages

Recognition Threshold (Constitutional Safeguard)

A community is RECOGNISED only if BOTH of the following conditions are met:

≥ 8
Total Score
Out of 15 points maximum
≥ 3
Criteria At or Above 2
At least 3 of the 5 criteria must score 2 or 3

This dual threshold prevents recognition based on a single strong criterion and ensures diverse pathways to qualification while maintaining constitutional rigor. It allows for different marginalisation profiles (e.g., a very isolated + culturally distinct + historically excluded community can qualify even with a slightly larger population).